A Rod admits steroid use from 2001-2003. Does his play since then make it less of an issue?

What gives me the reason to believe that he's telling the truth. This "PR stunt" gives him full immunity. Save face, and admit that you took it during the years when MLB didn't disallow it. However, don't you dare tell me that all of a sudden come the 2004 season, he just decided to change his regimen and stop taking. NO WAY. I'll grant him and one thing only. At least he had the to give a better "non full admission" than did his teammate Pettite. Pettite only took the needle once and didn't like the way he felt. Now if anybody believes that they should buy a bridge from the guy too. This kills his "legacy". What if he beats Hank by ten home runs, or fifty even???????????????? He's like Bonds now, he'll make the Hall because we all know he had a God given talent and would have put up great numbers anyway, however, he's a juicer. It's unfair to non juicers to have their stats compared. Maybe Killabrew, Frank Robinson, and Schmidt would have hit 875 on the juice?????????????? ARod's out. And this post is from an impartial fan. Cheers.